Half the population is below average! Shock!

Leave a comment

24/05/2013 by Chris Green

Einstein IQ preachingI mean, why doesn’t the government do something about it?

Half the population has below average IQ.

Half the population has a below average reading age.

Half the population has a below average attention span.

Half the population is below average!

But there’s a serious point behind the malarkey. What’s the average IQ? By definition, it’s 100. That’s how the description works: it puts intelligence on a bell-curve, and slices it down the middle. Half will always be below average.  nd for all that we might have problems about the way it’s all measured, the general principle holds

Where do you think you are on that spectrum?

Where do you think your preaching is aimed at on that spectrum? (If you don’t know, buy any tabloid newspaper – they are aimed at that half of the population)

Where do you think you need to be on that spectrum to read the Bible you use at church?

There are unusual churches which work in niche places where the average IQ is much higher. Blessings on them – they produce an outstanding number of young gospel workers. (I’m also seeing an increasing number of churches which are taking seriously the need to disciple adults with learning difficulties. Double blessings on them.)

But the rest of us don’t work that high IQ niche. And it’s foolish to let those churches set the pace for the rest of us, and for us to assume that what they do is ‘proper’ preaching, and that we have to match them. Which is especially tempting if we are products of those churches ourselves.

Do I want us to dumb down? Of course not. I want Christians to be theologically literate, able to read and engage with God’s Word, live it out and explain it to others.

But I want us to do so in a way that the vast majority of people can understand. My guess (informed, but a guess) is that most of the preaching I hear assumes an IQ of around 120 to process it. Graduate level.

What if we flipped the ratio? What if our modest target was an IQ of 90? We’d change our cultural references, our vocabulary, our sentence length. Our communication style would be less lecture, and more daytime TV. We’d be paying attention to far more people, and we still can address serious issues in proper ways.

So, do I want us to dumb down? Is this the thin end of the wedge? Can you see the start of an anti-intellectualism that will end up with trivial preachers peddling trivialities? Am I just one step from preaching fluff? Am I being as patronising as the educated TV producers who produce trash for the masses? I hope not. Just because I want to speak like daytime TV doesn’t mean I have to think like daytime TV.

But do you have a better plan?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Shortlisted for “Most Inspiring Leadership Blog, 2018”

New resource

Pastors are busy, and leading a church is a demanding task.  That’s why I wrote this e-bookchecklist: The Pastor’s Checkup – The Top 10 Questions every pastor needs to answer (and helpful stuff if you can’t)

There’s only way to get it is by subscribing to my  (occasional) email newsletter here.


God, Suffering and Joy

A conversation between me (with cancer) and Michael (with Multiple Sclerosis)

Legal stuff

This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do I store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyse and optimise your content and reading experience. I am not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without my permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice.

I welcome your participation on the Ministrynutsandbolts site, and invite you to share ideas elsewhere on what you learn and read here. At the same time, I ask that you respect my intellectual property rights in the process.

You are welcome to link to my site or any specific post on my site, extract and re-post less than 200 words on any other site, provided you link back to my original post, or print my posts in any non-commercial publication (e.g., company newsletter, class syllabus, church newsletter, etc.), provided you include this copyright notice: “© 2017 Chris Green. All rights reserved. Originally published at www.ministrynutsandbolts.com.”

Please do not do the following without written consent: Re-post one of my posts in its entirety anywhere else on the Internet, use this content for commercial purposes, including selling or licensing printed or digital versions of my content, or alter, transform, or build upon this work.

If you have some use for my content that is not covered here, please contact me. If you would like me to do a guest post on your blog, email me at ministrynutsandbolts@gmail.com

Copyright does not apply to the titles of books, but transparency means I should own that the title of the blog is taken from the excellent ‘Ministry Nuts and Bolts: What They Don’t Teach Pastors in Seminary ‘ by Aubrey Malphurs (Kregel: 2nd edn. 2009)

© 2018 Chris Green

%d bloggers like this: