The Good, the Best, and how to choose

1

23/02/2016 by Chris Green

A Good, better and best conceptchurch I know has just stopped running its mums and toddler group.  It’s stopped bumps and babies. It’s stopped – well, it’s stopped doing everything except bible studies.

The argument is that it’s too easy for us to be distracted from doing what we ought to be doing by what is secondary, and attractive, and diary-filling.

Now I have a lot of time for that argument as stated – too many of us spend too much of our time in what’s called ‘busy-work’ – stuff that seems to justify being paid, but doesn’t actually contribute to the overall aims of the organisation.  It’s true in hospitals, it’s true in banks – and it’s true in churches. I often wonder what lots of Christians ministers actually do all day (and I’m sure that if any of them think about me, they wonder the same).

But pause just a second.

The argument isn’t that other things than bible studies are wrong, it’s that (and here’s what was said to me), “The good is the enemy of the best.”

Now that is a useful little phrase, because it is often very true.  My diary shows the battle between the good and the best on a daily basis.

But that little phrase is also very unhelpful – because it can imply something very muddled if we assume that the best is bible study, and the rest is second-best.

What if your bible study is on James 1, and you hit v27: “Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world”

Now that flips the paradigm, because looking after widow and orphans now becomes the best thing to do, not a distraction from the best.  If someone said,”Let’s run a support group for the widows in our church,”, that would be the best thing, wouldn’t it? And if somebody replied, “OK, but only if it’s a bible study,” that rather misses the point of James 1 – yes, the bereaved need good food from the Word,but they also need good food in their larder, friendship, financial support, and more friendship.

‘Good’ and ‘best’ are not fixed categories, and if we put one thing, like bible study, permanently in the ‘best’ category, it implicitly demeans any other activity – which in this example is the putting into practice of a bible study.  The ‘best’ has become the enemy of the actual best.Good, better and best concept

So, keep nimble on those categories.  Don’t allow false choices to muddy your thinking or practice.

Would James want you to run another bible study, or to make sure the widow had a cooked meal on Sunday?

Why choose?

 

One thought on “The Good, the Best, and how to choose

  1. Shirley Welton says:

    Very thought provoking!
    I try to go by, what would Jesus do.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Publication of The Goldilocks Zone

Launch dayJanuary 18th, 2018
57 days to go.

Living as a Christian in the 21st century means we face constant battles to please God. That’s why I wrote ‘PURITY: Living to please God in an impure world – 15 daily readings in 1 Thessalonians.’

There’s only way to get it – by subscribing to my  email newsletter here.

Topics

God, Suffering and Joy

A conversation between me (with cancer) and Michael (with Multiple Sclerosis)

Terms and conditions

This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do I store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyse and optimise your content and reading experience. I am not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without my permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice.

I welcome your participation on the Ministrynutsandbolts site, and invite you to share ideas elsewhere on what you learn and read here. At the same time, I ask that you respect my intellectual property rights in the process.

You are welcome to link to my site or any specific post on my site, extract and re-post less than 200 words on any other site, provided you link back to my original post, or print my posts in any non-commercial publication (e.g., company newsletter, class syllabus, church newsletter, etc.), provided you include this copyright notice: “© 2017 Chris Green. All rights reserved. Originally published at www.ministrynutsandbolts.com.”

Please do not do the following without written consent: Re-post one of my posts in its entirety anywhere else on the Internet, use this content for commercial purposes, including selling or licensing printed or digital versions of my content, or alter, transform, or build upon this work.

If you have some use for my content that is not covered here, please contact me. If you would like me to do a guest post on your blog, email me at ministrynutsandbolts@gmail.com

Copyright does not apply to the titles of books, but transparency means I should own that the title of the blog is taken from the excellent ‘Ministry Nuts and Bolts: What They Don’t Teach Pastors in Seminary ‘ by Aubrey Malphurs (Kregel: 2nd edn. 2009)

© 2017 Chris Green

%d bloggers like this: