When ‘shoulder to shoulder’ isn’t enough

8

11/02/2016 by Chris Green

arc-of-pebblesI went to a strong, hearty conference recently, full of talk about gospel work and initiatives, and the theme was ‘standing shoulder to shoulder.’

And I thought then, as I still think, that that’s all very well, but it’s still very independent.

The model is that strong (i.e. larger)  churches can help weaker  (i.e. smaller) ones, and together we can make a difference – which is true, but not true enough.

  • What if the ‘strong’ churches aren’t quite as strong as they look – what if, in line with 1 Corinthians, they actually need the ‘weaker’ churches, rather than the other way round?
  • What if ‘shoulder to shoulder’ is implicitly too, well, ‘hearty’ as an image? (Yes, I know it’s a biblical phase, but frankly, if your only source passage is Zephaniah 3, then you really are off the beaten track by some way)
  • What if the pipeline of grace isn’t just one way?
  • What if the pipeline of grace runs the other way entirely?
  • What if we replaced ‘independence’ with ‘interdependence’  –  would that make a difference?

 

20130625-120344-2


You can now order ‘The Message of the Church‘ (The Bible Speaks Today)

You can order (discount) from 10ofthose here,

Otherwise, from Amazon here, and for your Kindle here.

41kfXw4GBsL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_

US edition available from Amazon here, and for your Kindle here.

Aussie? Koorong has it here.

8 thoughts on “When ‘shoulder to shoulder’ isn’t enough

  1. Richard Bray says:

    Hi Chris – I assumed ‘shoulder to shoulder’ was an allusion to Philippians 1:27 (I can’t find the phrase in Zephaniah 3!). I also took the theme to be precisely about interdependence rather than independence. And I didn’t think the conference was about ‘strong’ churches exclusively helping the ‘weak’ (my own ‘weak’ church was offered as one of the many case studies). Strange how our responses could be so different! Richard

    • Chris Green says:

      Zeph 3:9 (NIV – nothing like it ESV!). Phil 1 does talk about striving together as one, but not the same. If we are we’re talking about the same conference (!), I do remember hearing about the weaker churches needing the larger, or even needing other weaker ones, but (as I recall, open to correction) nothing about larger needing the smaller. I remember your case study and finding it very encouraging – but I still can’t remember how the larger churches actively benefit from smaller ones, and are hampered without them. Did I miss a note?

      • Richard Bray says:

        Fair enough. I wasn’t as conscious of the theme of strong churches helping the weak as you were. I heard it more as interdependence. As a leader of a weak church I didn’t feel like the runt of the litter! But true that we need to be actively reminded of how the strong need the weak.

      • Chris Green says:

        And I was there from a position of extreme (personal) weakness, accurately aware of my own ability to be Corinthian.

  2. Actually I would say the opposite about the conference. It’s the first conference where little guys like me had input to the planning and had airtime at the front. We were part of the training sessions in seminars. Also the sort of partnership we set up with St Helen’s in the lead up to that conference was based on the fact that it’s a 2 way – for example I’ve just had a guy shadowing me for a week from St Helen’s for me to help train him for the future.

    • Chris Green says:

      So I just had a grumpy day? Maybe – but I still had a whiff of something I’m still worrying about and watching closely. the temptation to be Corinthian is always too close for comfort.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Publication of The Goldilocks Zone

Launch dayJanuary 18th, 2018
3 months to go.

Living as a Christian in the 21st century means we face constant battles to please God. That’s why I wrote ‘PURITY: Living to please God in an impure world – 15 daily readings in 1 Thessalonians.’

There’s only way to get it – by subscribing to my  email newsletter here.

Index

God, Suffering and Joy

A conversation between me (with cancer) and Michael (with Multiple Sclerosis)

Terms and conditions

This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do I store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyse and optimise your content and reading experience. I am not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without my permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice.

I welcome your participation on the Ministrynutsandbolts site, and invite you to share ideas elsewhere on what you learn and read here. At the same time, I ask that you respect my intellectual property rights in the process.

You are welcome to link to my site or any specific post on my site, extract and re-post less than 200 words on any other site, provided you link back to my original post, or print my posts in any non-commercial publication (e.g., company newsletter, class syllabus, church newsletter, etc.), provided you include this copyright notice: “© 2017 Chris Green. All rights reserved. Originally published at www.ministrynutsandbolts.com.”

Please do not do the following without written consent: Re-post one of my posts in its entirety anywhere else on the Internet, use this content for commercial purposes, including selling or licensing printed or digital versions of my content, or alter, transform, or build upon this work.

If you have some use for my content that is not covered here, please contact me. If you would like me to do a guest post on your blog, email me at ministrynutsandbolts@gmail.com

Copyright does not apply to the titles of books, but transparency means I should own that the title of the blog is taken from the excellent ‘Ministry Nuts and Bolts: What They Don’t Teach Pastors in Seminary ‘ by Aubrey Malphurs (Kregel: 2nd edn. 2009)

© 2017 Chris Green

%d bloggers like this: